http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48047
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-09
19:06:12 UTC ---
For what it is worth: On x86-64-linux (openSUSE Factory, GLIBC 2.11.3), I get:
Got: 0.142857142857142849212692681248881854120
Expected: 0.142857142857142849212692681248881854116
Got: 0.142857142857142849212692681248881854120
Expected: 0.142857142857142849212692681248881854117
Using ifort 11.1 on the same machine:
Got: 0.142857142857142849212692681248881854100
Expected: 0.142857142857142849212692681248881854116
Got: 0.142857142857142849212692681248881854200
Expected: 0.142857142857142849212692681248881854117
Using crayftn 7.2.4, I get on another x86-64-linux (SLES 10/Cray):
Got: 0.142857142857142849000000000000000000000
Expected: 0.142857142857142849212692681248881854116
Got: +.142857142857142849000000000000000000000
Expected: 0.142857142857142849212692681248881854117
My impression is that all twelve numbers are numerically identical and lead to
the same binary representation. Hence, I believe the three compilers print the
correct result.
