http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47357
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-19
10:44:54 UTC ---
I can't see anything in the program that would be affected by a 'volatile'
keyword. Instead I see a lot of bogus ways to try to circumvent type-based
aliasing rules (using volatile is one). Use -fno-strict-aliasing.
