http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-01-07 19:16:42 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr>
> 2011-01-05 22:31:14 UTC ---
>> * We should use i?86*-*-* (or perhaps just i?86-*-*, I see no reason for the
>> first *).
>
> I don't think this cover x86_64-*-*, this is why I have tested *86*-*-*
Indeed, had forgotten about that. In that case, we should do as
everywhere else in the testsuite and explicitly list i?86-*-* and
x86_64-*-*. Just *86*-*-* is too general (there was a sparcle86 or
something, I think :-).
>> * The comment should be updated (perhaps with PR #s) to provide documentation
>> for the XFAILed changes.
>
> See the end of comment #2. This should probably addressed by the objc
> maintainers.
Probably, and hopefully the will do so once we finally propose the patch
and get approval.
With the exception of x86_64 handling above, we're good to go, I think.
Rainer
