http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #6 from Ian Bolton <ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-05 14:38:42 UTC --- > I mean, the <But r1 is an input as well as an output , i.e. "referred to", so > insn 3163 should have matched without your patch. I'm missing analysis on why > that didn't happen> part. OK, I will do more analysis to try to determine what's going on.
