http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049
--- Comment #3 from Eamon Nerbonne <emn13+gcc at nerbonne dot org> 2010-12-23 09:33:11 UTC --- Oh, and finally: a comment on the mingw64 tracker is meaningless to me but perhaps useful to you: ktietz70 said: "So, I investigate your issue a bit. First this is for sure a gcc bug, which calls here write_unnamed_type_name for an ENUMERAL_TYPE, which isn't unnamed. The issue is related to write_nested_name, which doesn't special case here named enumeral types."
