http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-14
08:36:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> @@ -2717,7 +2717,7 @@ gfc_get_sym_tree (const char *name, gfc_namespace
> if (ns == NULL)
> - ns = gfc_current_ns;
> + ns = gfc_find_proc_namespace (gfc_current_ns);
That looks wrong. gfc_get_sym_tree is called several times in decl.c, match.c,
parse.c and primary.c with NULL - I fear that this patch will cause symbols end
up in the wrong name space.
I think one should rather do something like the following - though one might
need to be a bit more careful and restrict it, e.g., to procedures.
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
@@ -11784,7 +11784,7 @@ resolve_symbol (gfc_symbol *sym)
for (ns = gfc_current_ns->parent; ns; ns = ns->parent)
{
symtree = gfc_find_symtree (ns->sym_root, sym->name);
- if (symtree && symtree->n.sym->generic)
+ if (symtree) /* && symtree->n.sym->generic)*/
{
this_symtree = gfc_find_symtree (gfc_current_ns->sym_root,
sym->name);
