http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |law at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail| |
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-29
19:50:18 UTC ---
Jeff/Vlad, how hard would it be to try to split the insn into two insns instead
of a spill failure (for insns using a MEM whose address uses more than one hard
register) - one which forces the address into register (assuming it is
supported) and the store (or load) which would use a simpler address form?
