http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46680
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-27
14:53:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> My suggestion is directed specifically to -O0.
If you want optimised code then use optimisation.
> I also know about UB. The strange behavior I'm referring to regards the
> compiler implementation rather than the language specification. I just looked
> for this, because I expected a consistent behavior in gcc for non-initialized
> bool values in that matter.
No. You cannot expect undefined behaviour to be consistent.
