http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46581
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-20 17:04:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > It was working at r166401 (and r166825?), but fails at r166914. Possibly a > regression of r166480. I just checked: It's indeed due to my r166480.