http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #31 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-12 13:09:42 UTC --- The patch in comment #16 makes sense (it's similar to what we do in memcpy folding to avoid the situation - and to avoid re-writing of strict-alignment target handling in memory reference expanding).