http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46347
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2010-11-11 23:52:50 UTC --- Very well, I may well be wrong, I admit to have filed this enhancement PR basing only on some quite small tests + the definite impression that we have functions inline in the profile-mode infrastructure headers which are definitely too large, in general should definitely be exported by the library. But if we are talking about an overhead which doesn't grow with the size of user code, the issue seems not so serious. Good. I'd like to double check that, before closing the issue as invalid, anyway. Also, I'd like to make sure that we don't run in more serious problems when the coverage is indeed increased - very soon I hope!
