http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46332
Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-11-09 19:53:18 |2010.11.10 05:17:05
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #11 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2010-11-10 05:17:05
UTC ---
I agree that for _Z3fooIiPFidEiEvv we should use (*), and in fact we do use
(*), with or without the patch attached to this PR. This PR is about a
different sort of symbol, _Z3fooIiFvdEiEvv, or, in the current 14.cc,
_Z3fooIiFvdEiEvv. The key difference here is that these symbols use F rather
than PF, which means that refer to a function type rather than a pointer to a
function type. I'm not sure exactly what it means to instantiate a template
with a function type, but g++ does generate these sort of symbols. I could
change the () to (*), but that would imply a pointer to a function type which
isn't what we have.
So my question for Ben is: should we change the expected demangling in 14.cc to
be void foo<int, void (double), int>() or should we do something else.
