> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 > > --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-19 > 04:42:40 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #6) > > I think both indirect inlining and constant propagation should be able to > > get > > past the cast especially when there is no type mismatch in the testcase. > > Either try with (void) in the function declaration or try using the C++ > front-end. () and (void) are different in C :).
Well, still we have no real reason to not optimize this. C programs does this. Honza
