http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45896
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
Summary|Facet time_get not reading |[C++0x] Facet time_get not
|dates according to the |reading dates according to
|standard. |the IEEE 1003 standard.
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2010-10-05
16:46:41 UTC ---
I suppose you are referring to the sentences "leading zeros shall be permitted
but shall not be required", right? Because they do *not* exist in the C(99) ISO
Standard, which is the normative reference for C++98, in this area. In general,
ISO 8601, in turn, is pretty strict about those formats.
Only C++0x references explicitly "the ISO/IEC 9945 function strptime" (ISO/IEC
9945 is the same as IEEE 1003), which is more flexible about leading zeros.
Thus, C++0x work, in due course...
