http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 14:19:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Note: The problem not only applies to procedure pointers, but also to data > pointers, as the following example shows: Well, at least this example is invalid by the same logic as the original test case. However, I'm not sure I fully understand this logic ... In contrast to my annotation in the previous example, C551 does not apply (since it only talks about nonpointers). And C552 only says that a protected pointer cannot appear in a "pointer association context" (i.e. the LHS of a pointer assignment). It does not say that a protected pointer cannot appear on the RHS of a pointer assignment!?!
