------- Comment #4 from sebastian dot huber at embedded-brains dot de
2010-09-10 15:59 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> >For volatile fields we should use accesses of the appropriate width.
>
> The PowerPC ABI has specific rules for accessing volatile bitfields and IIRC
> it
> says they should be doing the largest available (up to the register size)
> size.
>
> This is different from the ARM ABI which says the opposite.
>
Thank you very much for your comments. I will investigate the PowerPC ABI
issue and contact the manufacturer. Ironically they produced the ABI and these
register definitions.
--
sebastian dot huber at embedded-brains dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45637
