------- Comment #2 from dpovey at gmail dot com  2010-08-23 21:51 -------
(In reply to comment #1)

Yes you are right, but it is more than that bug, because I created an example
where gcc wrongly *rejects* code that it should accept, as well as one where it
wrongly accepts code that it should reject.

BTW, Visual Studio (2010) has different behavior -- it accepts both of the
statements in main(), even though they require different parse trees.  However,
unlike gcc, it will not *accept* the "template" keyword on the line where (for
the first parse tree) it should be required.  Thus, fixing this gcc bug will
lead people to code in such a way that their code cannot compile in Visual
Studio.


Dan

> Looks related to PR 11814.
> 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45374

Reply via email to