------- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-26 13:45 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > > Note that since revision 162531 (-fwhole-file is now the default) the tests > > in > > this pr no longer give ICEs. However these ICEs reappear when the tests are > > compiled with -fno-whole-file. > > Then, I am inclined to close it as WONTFIX. As written elsewhere: > -fno-whole-file is deprecated and I want to remove it early in 4.7 (though > others disagree).
Well, I am among those who disagree. I think the flag -fno-whole-file will be quite useful to locate remaining failure due to -fwhole-file and I seriously doubt that the list will be exhausted before stage 3 of 4.7 (in addition I don't see the interest of irregular options: if you want to get rid of the -fno-whole-file, you should also remove -fwhole-file and all the associated machinery!-). I think this PR should be left open as P5 and enhancement. If some day the options -f(no-)?while-file and the corresponding code are removed, then it could be close as wontfiw or invalid. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37744
