------- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de  2010-07-21 08:09 -------
Subject: Re:  INTENT(IN) etc. optimization of calls:
 function annotations for noclobber/noescape arguments

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> ------- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-20 16:12 
> -------
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > No, this problem was present for ipa-sra, but I thought it was fixed.
> > Does -fno-ipa-sra help?
> 
> No, it doesn't. But with that option, the number of arguments still reduces
> from 4 to 2 (before: 1). But again, the code works if one reorders the
> arguments such that the "w" attribute matches the "x" argument (now at 
> position
> 2 instead of 1).

So I wonder what code removes the arguments then.

Richard.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43665

Reply via email to