------- Comment #8 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-07-08 08:55 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Yes, it would be possible to keep other threads around, the question is how > many and how long, at which point start to destroy them.
I can test what other implementations are doing, but I suspect that for the non-nested case, OMP_NUM_THREADS will be created and never destroyed. At least for HPC applications this seems to make sense. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44833
