------- Comment #35 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-07-08 08:46 ------- Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure for C++ i386.c
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #34 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-08 01:10 > ------- > FWIW, this simple patch stops the comparison failures both for my reduced > testcase as for the original testcase. I'm not sure if we want to > pay the price of carryinig more labels around for -g0, or if we'd rather > fix the ordering issues somehow. The ordering issue in VRP needs to be fixed. The sorting can use LABEL_DECL_UID which is dense in a given function. (but watch out for a -1 value where no UID has been assigned) Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44832