------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-06-30 16:15 -------
This makes it to compile:
--
diff --git a/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c b/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
index b73517d..c3890ec 100644
--- a/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
+++ b/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
@@ -1779,10 +1779,12 @@ build_poly_dr (data_reference_p dr, poly_bb_p pbb)
ppl_delete_Polyhedron (accesses);
if (dr->aux)
- dr_base_object_set = ((base_alias_pair *)(dr->aux))->base_obj_set;
-
- new_poly_dr (pbb, dr_base_object_set, accesses_ps, DR_IS_READ (dr) ?
PDR_READ : PDR_WRITE,
- dr, DR_NUM_DIMENSIONS (dr));
+ {
+ dr_base_object_set = ((base_alias_pair *)(dr->aux))->base_obj_set;
+ new_poly_dr (pbb, dr_base_object_set, accesses_ps,
+ DR_IS_READ (dr) ? PDR_READ : PDR_WRITE,
+ dr, DR_NUM_DIMENSIONS (dr));
+ }
}
/* Write to FILE the alias graph of data references in DIMACS format. */
@@ -1921,13 +1923,12 @@ build_alias_set_optimal_p (VEC (data_reference_p, heap)
*drs)
for (i = 0; i < g->n_vertices; i++)
{
data_reference_p dr = VEC_index (data_reference_p, drs, i);
- base_alias_pair *bap;
-
if (dr->aux)
- bap = (base_alias_pair *)(dr->aux);
-
- bap->alias_set = XNEW (int);
- *(bap->alias_set) = g->vertices[i].component + 1;
+ {
+ base_alias_pair *bap = (base_alias_pair *)(dr->aux);
+ bap->alias_set = XNEW (int);
+ *(bap->alias_set) = g->vertices[i].component + 1;
+ }
}
/* Verify if the DFS numbering results in optimal solution. */
@@ -2000,12 +2001,11 @@ build_base_obj_set_for_drs (VEC (data_reference_p,
heap) *drs)
for (i = 0; i < g->n_vertices; i++)
{
data_reference_p dr = VEC_index (data_reference_p, drs, i);
- base_alias_pair *bap;
-
if (dr->aux)
- bap = (base_alias_pair *)(dr->aux);
-
- bap->base_obj_set = g->vertices[i].component + 1;
+ {
+ base_alias_pair *bap = (base_alias_pair *)(dr->aux);
+ bap->base_obj_set = g->vertices[i].component + 1;
+ }
}
free (queue);
---
But I don't know if it is correct.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44730
