------- Comment #2 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-06-29 11:00 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> - asm ("asm2%U0 %0" : "=m" (*p));
> + asm ("asm2%U0 %0" : "=m<>" (*p));
That fixed the test case. Thanks. I didn't know about the PowerPC-specific %U
thing, but now I see that the compiler did the right thing.
Seems like the descriptions of "m" and "es" in the PowerPC-specific part of
md.texi are now a bit stale: "es" should be equivalent to "m", and "m" should
be safe (free of side-effects) unless accompanied by "<" or ">".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44701
