------- Comment #6 from amodra at gmail dot com 2010-06-17 04:13 -------
Hmm. Well, perhaps the thing to do is ensure we don't get a tail call by
making the same change as in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg01726.html
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c (revision 160820)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c (working copy)
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ int check_fa (char *unused)
{
const char c = 0;
- return check_fa_mid (&c);
+ return check_fa_mid (&c) != 0;
}
int how_much (void)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44505
