------- Comment #58 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-03 07:57 ------- (In reply to comment #57) > (In reply to comment #46)
> Other than that, you guys manage to write a lot about this but still not > answer > all questions (both of which makes it unattractive for others to look at a > PR). > What about missing volatile for comment #39, as in > > static int * volatile a_in_other_thread; sorry, I missed that. That correction does _not_ make the tests behave deterministically on darwin10. The tests behave deterministically with/without it on darwin9 (pass at O0, fail > O0). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43170
