------- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-05-31 18:02 
-------
There is nothing strange about this, the backslash simply means that the
comment, which start after the //, continues to the next line, thus the second
printf is part of the comment. Just use -E to see that the preprocessor removes
the second printf as any other comment.


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44355

Reply via email to