------- Comment #1 from changpeng dot fang at amd dot com  2010-05-27 20:49 
-------
The regressions are most likely from the patch that added non-constant step
prefetching:

    * From: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
    * To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de dot ibm dot com>
    * Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
    * Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:40:51 +0200
    * Subject: Re: [patch 4/4 v4] Allow loop prefetch code to speculatively
prefetch non constant steps



             * tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (mem_ref_group): Change step to tree.
             * tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (ar_data): Change step to tree.
             * tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (dump_mem_ref): Adopt debug code to
             handle a tree as step.  This also checks for a constant int vs.
             non-constant but loop-invariant steps.
             * tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (find_or_create_group): Change the sort
             algorithm to only consider steps that are constant ints.
             * tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (idx_analyze_ref): Adopt code to handle
             a tree instead of a HOST_WIDE_INT for step.
             * tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (gather_memory_references_ref): Handle
             tree instead of int and be prepared to see a NULL_TREE.
             * tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (prune_ref_by_self_reuse): Do not prune
             prefetches if the step cannot be calculated at compile time.
             * tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (prune_ref_by_group_reuse): Do not
prune
             prefetches if the step cannot be calculated at compile time.
             * tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (issue_prefetch_ref): Issue prefetches
             for non-constant but loop-invariant steps.


Applied to mainline. Thanks!


-- 

changpeng dot fang at amd dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |borntraeger at de dot ibm
                   |                            |dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44297

Reply via email to