------- Comment #40 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-03 22:47 ------- Jack, if I follow what you want, that's an LTO fix, I don't know the LTO code. I don't know that that fix is even possible. I think one must do the LTO_SYM fix, if I had to guess. I don't have the time to embark upon learning all the LTO bits to that work.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43729
