------- Comment #40 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-05-03 22:47 -------
Jack, if I follow what you want, that's an LTO fix, I don't know the LTO code. 
I don't know that that fix is even possible.  I think one must do the LTO_SYM
fix, if I had to guess.  I don't have the time to embark upon learning all the
LTO bits to that work.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43729

Reply via email to