------- Comment #26 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-04-25 18:28 -------
Subject: Re: [fortran-dev Regression] ICE: segmentation
fault
Dear Janus,
I thought that I would lend a helping hand, so I applied your latest
patch to my fortran-dev. Since I had left some of my array reference
development in place, it failed to apply on
***************
*** 2486,2492 ****
not to the class declared type. */
vtab = gfc_find_derived_vtab (e->ts.u.derived, true);
gcc_assert (vtab);
- gfc_trans_assign_vtab_procs (&parmse->pre, vtab);
tmp = gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, gfc_get_symbol_decl (vtab));
gfc_add_modify (&parmse->pre, ctree,
fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (ctree), tmp));
--- 2486,2492 ----
not to the class declared type. */
vtab = gfc_find_derived_vtab (e->ts.u.derived, true);
gcc_assert (vtab);
+ gfc_trans_assign_vtab_procs (&parmse->pre, e->ts.u.derived, vtab);
tmp = gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, gfc_get_symbol_decl (vtab));
gfc_add_modify (&parmse->pre, ctree,
fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (ctree), tmp));
Since this was a compilable source, even with the failure, I decided
to build it anyway. Lo and behold, the regressions have gone :-)
It's just now regtesting.
Please find the whole diff attached.
I hope that this helps.
Cheers
Paul
------- Comment #27 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-04-25 18:28 -------
Created an attachment (id=20486)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20486&action=view)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42274
