------- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2010-04-21 15:30 -------
4.3.1 ([gcc-4_3-branch revision 135036]) does not fail, so marking as
regression.
4.5.0 works as well

with 4.4.4 I have this backtrace:

(gdb) bt
#0  bitmap_element_allocate (head=0x10284c0) at
/data03/vondele/gcc_4_4_branch/gcc/gcc/bitmap.c:206
#1  0x00000000004d076c in bitmap_set_bit (head=0x10284c0, bit=<value optimized
out>) at /data03/vondele/gcc_4_4_branch/gcc/gcc/bitmap.c:638
#2  0x00000000009ba0b0 in compute_dominance_frontiers (frontiers=0x1028440) at
/data03/vondele/gcc_4_4_branch/gcc/gcc/cfganal.c:1278
#3  0x00000000006d5849 in rewrite_into_ssa () at
/data03/vondele/gcc_4_4_branch/gcc/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:2256
#4  0x00000000006171db in execute_one_pass (pass=0xf795c0) at
/data03/vondele/gcc_4_4_branch/gcc/gcc/passes.c:1277
#5  0x0000000000617415 in execute_pass_list (pass=0xf795c0) at
/data03/vondele/gcc_4_4_branch/gcc/gcc/passes.c:1326
#6  0x0000000000617735 in execute_ipa_pass_list (pass=0xf79800) at
/data03/vondele/gcc_4_4_branch/gcc/gcc/passes.c:890
#7  0x0000000000805301 in cgraph_optimize () at
/data03/vondele/gcc_4_4_branch/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1237
#8  0x0000000000490d6a in gfc_be_parse_file (set_yydebug=<value optimized out>)
at /data03/vondele/gcc_4_4_branch/gcc/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:240
#9  0x00000000006a7fb4 in toplev_main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=<value
optimized out>) at /data03/vondele/gcc_4_4_branch/gcc/gcc/toplev.c:970
#10 0x00007f91de717436 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#11 0x00000000004061a9 in _start ()


-- 

jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|                            |4.4.4
      Known to work|                            |4.3.1 4.5.0
            Summary|ice with -fexceptions and - |[4.4 Regression] ice with -
                   |fopenmp                     |fexceptions and -fopenmp


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43836

Reply via email to