------- Comment #6 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-17 17:15 ------- I can't see how it would hurt to allow combine to always merge insns that are known to be consecutive (ie to ignore CLASS_LIKELY_SPILLED_P if prev_nonenote_insn(consumer) == producer).
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43597
