------- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 09:56 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Hi! > > I was wondering if this bug is likely to be fixed in the next GCC release; is > this likely to be the case?
Unlikely. Backporting the one-line change will cause massive performance problems elsewhere (with scalar times complex multiplication). There is more to be backported. The question is if the Fortran standard allows C*CX(IX) to be unconditionally implemented as C * __real CX(IX) + _I * C * __imag CX(IX) or not. It would be also interesting to know what vectorization makes for a difference here, as it shouldn't change semantics. Thus, did anyone analyze why only the vectorized variant exhibits the problem? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43251
