------- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-15 10:32 ------- Is this valid? The 'foo' typedef needs the address of X::x but occurs before it has been defined.
Comeau gives
line 18: error: explicit specialization of member
"X<<unnamed>>::x [with <unnamed>=false]" must precede its first use (
at line 13)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43368
