[Bug libstdc++/41975] [C++0x] [DR579] unordered_set::erase performs worse when nearly empty

[sjackman at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #19 from sjackman at gmail dot com  2010-03-09 19:15 -------
How does the Dinkumware implementation avoid the performance hit of erase
returning an iterator?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975