------- Comment #2 from mh+gcc at glandium dot org 2010-03-02 17:37 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > That's because x86-64 defaults to -fasynchronous-unwind-tables. You really > want that by default on x86_64, as frame pointer is usually omitted.
Why would you want -fasynchronous-unwind-tables if you don't have exceptions ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43232
