------- Comment #18 from bart dot vanassche at gmail dot com 2010-02-25 07:00 ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > > Incidentally, perhaps we should mark the this parameter as __restrict... > > > > I don't see how this would be correct (or useful). > > Hmm, I suppose it is possible to have another identical pointer in the case of > placement new.
Invoking a constructor twice successively via placement new is questionable programming style. One should use plain functions instead of abusing constructors. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808
