------- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 12:44 -------
Created an attachment (id=19946)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19946&action=view)
gcc45-pr43161.patch
Untested patch that fixes this. I'm not 100% sure whether it is safe to call
df_analyze just for -g and not for -g0 when DF_LR_RUN_DCE isn't set in the pass
(i.e. whether it wouldn't introduce any debug info regressions). This patch
version calls it unconditionally, if we could call it just for -g, we could
call it only after detecting there is at least one DEBUG_INSN change queued at
the end of any bb.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43161
