------- Comment #9 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-02-18 20:29 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> For the record, all the compilers I have at hand, EDG based too, accept this
> in
> the most strict mode. I seriously doubt there is really something to fix here.
That said: if it is unclear to people well versed in the language standard
whether the code is correct or not (and does what it is supposed to do or not)
then one could argue that the code is also hard to read.
In other words: there may not be a need to change the code for *correctness
reasons*, but the *is* a need to change the code to make it more maintainable.
I believe that's a valid argument in software design to change things.
W.
--
bangerth at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bangerth at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9990
