------- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-02-17 17:57 
-------
Mark, with your permission, I'm restoring P3: indeed, strictly speaking the
failure of that specific testcase isn't a regression, because it didn't exist
in gcc4.4.x, but I understand it uncovered a rather subtle problem in the C++
front-end. Anyway, I agree that we should figure out a plain C++ testcase,
outside the libstdc++ testsuite, which fails only in 4.5, otherwise, I will
understand if you release managers eventually decide to xfail the library
testcase. But Jason is on it already... ;)


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P4                          |P3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43075

Reply via email to