------- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-02-17 17:57 ------- Mark, with your permission, I'm restoring P3: indeed, strictly speaking the failure of that specific testcase isn't a regression, because it didn't exist in gcc4.4.x, but I understand it uncovered a rather subtle problem in the C++ front-end. Anyway, I agree that we should figure out a plain C++ testcase, outside the libstdc++ testsuite, which fails only in 4.5, otherwise, I will understand if you release managers eventually decide to xfail the library testcase. But Jason is on it already... ;)
-- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P4 |P3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43075