------- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 17:38 ------- I think we need to understand Steven's comment that ipa-struct-reorg is "broken". This pass isn't on by default, AFAICT, so that decreases it's risk. But, if it's broken-by-design, as opposed to has-a-few-bugs, then we should indeed consider disabling it, at least on the release branch. The argument that it's good for us to enable people to test things is not strong if in fact we already know that the thing being tested is badly broken.
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43084