------- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-02 21:26 -------
That example does not match the text of the standard, and was fixed by
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#197

However, the standard might change to say what you expect, depending on the
resolution of http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#225


-- 

jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-02-02 21:26:07
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31816

Reply via email to