------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-25 09:37 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> This appears to fix this: regression tested on x86-64
I think the following patch is better. My intrinsic check was bogus.
Index: array.c
===================================================================
--- array.c (revision 156196)
+++ array.c (working copy)
@@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ gfc_array_dimen_size (gfc_expr *array, i
}
if (array->symtree->n.sym->attr.generic
- && !array->symtree->n.sym->attr.intrinsic)
+ && array->value.function.esym != NULL)
{
if (spec_dimen_size (array->value.function.esym->as, dimen, result)
== FAILURE)
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-01-25 01:18:04 |2010-01-25 09:37:46
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42858
