------- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-17 21:18 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Here is a reduced test case: > > module mod1 > type :: t1 > contains > procedure, nopass :: get => my_get > end type > contains > logical function my_get() > end function > end module > > module mod2 > contains > logical function my_get() ! must have the same name as the function in > mod1 > end function > end module > > module mod3 > contains > subroutine sub(a) > use mod2, only: my_get > use mod1, only: t1 ! order of use statements is important > type(t1) :: a ! 'a' must be dummy > end subroutine > end module > > > use mod2, only: my_get > use mod3, only: sub ! order of use statements is important > end >
I got pr42769-2.f90:14: mod1 1 Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1) pr42769-2.f90:21.26: use mod2, only: my_get 1 Fatal Error: Can't open module file 'mod2.mod' for reading at (1): No such file or directory -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42769