------- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2010-01-17 21:18 
-------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Here is a reduced test case:
> 
> module mod1
>   type :: t1
>   contains
>     procedure, nopass :: get => my_get
>   end type
> contains 
>   logical function my_get()
>   end function
> end module
> 
> module mod2
> contains 
>   logical function my_get()     ! must have the same name as the function in
> mod1
>   end function
> end module
> 
> module mod3
> contains
>   subroutine sub(a)
>     use mod2, only: my_get
>     use mod1, only: t1          ! order of use statements is important
>     type(t1) :: a               ! 'a' must be dummy
>   end subroutine
> end module
> 
> 
> use mod2, only: my_get
> use mod3, only: sub             ! order of use statements is important
> end 
> 

I got

pr42769-2.f90:14:

mod1
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
pr42769-2.f90:21.26:

    use mod2, only: my_get
                          1
Fatal Error: Can't open module file 'mod2.mod' for reading at (1): No such file
or directory


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42769

Reply via email to