------- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-07 23:17
-------
Nope... I went through this and came to the conclusion that a fairly good
implementation has to wait for a complete resolution of N2983: the request is
non-binding thus if the move constructor can throw and the type T isn't
CopyConstructible the implementation should not do anything. Given the
subtleties wrt throwing move constructors recently surfaced, I think we'll add
this member in due course, in any case *after* having tweaked the internals of
the std containers for the other traditional member functions...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42573
