------- Comment #2 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 15:20 ------- Fixed by Paul's patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg00378.html Prior to this patch, when debugging the testcase I see: (gdb) subfunc (a=492, b=2097148, c=0, d=...) at test.c:9 9 printf("a %x b %x c %x d.y %x d.z %x\n",a,b,c,d.y,d.z); With the patch, I see: subfunc (a=0, b=1, c=2, d=...) at test.c:9 9 printf("a %x b %x c %x d.y %x d.z %x\n",a,b,c,d.y,d.z); (gdb) p d $1 = {y = 3, z = 4} -- rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31004
