------- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-15 17:38 ------- Changing the value, via macro or whatever is trivial, and I can tell you for sure from some experiment I did, that a *larger* value is much better, when memory is available, for operations like copies. Changing the value however, breaks the binary compatibility between objects (e.g, one allocating, the other deallocating the same deque), it's a dangerous option.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42381
