------- Comment #13 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-14 08:39 ------- Yes, you understood correctly, that is our policy and nothing changes if you overstate the issue by using the "broken" catch-all. To repeat, our general policy is that any issue corresponding to an ISO DR is not dealt with until the DR has reached at least [Ready] status, because we cannot risk going back and forward between different resolutions and other tentative fixes. Normally the policy is applied even more strictly for C++0x issues, given the experimental nature.
That said, this specific issue has been moved yesterday to [Tentatively Ready] and it's safe enough to simply re-add for now the C++03 set of overloads (we don't implement yet the C++0x allocator model), I'll do that later today. For reference: http://home.roadrunner.com/~hinnant/issue_review/lwg-active.html#1133 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42352
