------- Comment #8 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 15:57 ------- So we have new direct call appearing to function that has been previously eliminated as unreachable (after inlining) as a result of devirtualization? In general if function have address taken, we should not remove it since it is needed, or is that the special vtable handling?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42110
