------- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-09-20 19:11
-------
Jason, can you have a look to this issue? I believe submitter is right. Should
we use TYPE_HAS_TRIVIAL_DFLT instead? Note sure about
TYPE_HAS_TRIVIAL_INIT_REF, TYPE_HAS_TRIVIAL_ASSIGN_REF, and
TYPE_HAS_TRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR. Humm, maybe just "reversing" the logic in
trivial_type_p is enough?!?
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |paolo dot carlini at oracle
| |dot com, jason at gcc dot
| |gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41421
