------- Comment #17 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-20 17:02 ------- (In reply to comment #16) > As specified they should ignore dwarf codes they do not understand, not assert > on them. Please if you care report this issue to apple (it's probably enough > to send them along a file that crashes their tool). > There still is an oddity here. I can trigger this problem in current gcc trunk with a conftest.c but not with a conftest.i (comment 6). This suggest it might be difficult to construct a standalone testcase since the assembly files created from both methods are identical (but only the first case results in an asset...weird).
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41405
